David Smith wrote: > What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of > raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
It should be fine. Under some circumstances the performance could be similar to a pool with all raidz groups of the smallest size you used (less bandwidth). --matt > > For example: > > pool: testpool1 > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > testpool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007234685122Ad0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007254685123Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000072F46851256d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073146851266d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073746851278d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074146851292d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000747468512B6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000749468512C2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074F468512E0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000751468512E8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007574685130Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075946851318d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075F4685132Ed0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000076546851342d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > Thanks, > > David > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
