After a cup of French coffee, I feel strong enough to recommend :-) David Smith wrote: > What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of > raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
It is more complicated and, in general, more complicated is a bad thing. But in your example, with only 2 top-level vdevs, it isn't overly complicated. Performance issues will be difficult to predict because this hasn't been studied. With the gazillions of possible permutations, it is not likely to be extensively characterized. But it if it works for you, then be happy :-) -- richard > For example: > > pool: testpool1 > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > testpool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007234685122Ad0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007254685123Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000072F46851256d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073146851266d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073746851278d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074146851292d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000747468512B6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000749468512C2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074F468512E0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000751468512E8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007574685130Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075946851318d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075F4685132Ed0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000076546851342d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > Thanks, > > David > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
