Matt,

Thank you for your reply.  I like to keep the raidz groups with the same
number of disks but it is not always that easily to have the numbers
work out way.

David


On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 14:49 -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> David Smith wrote:
> > What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of
> > raidz groups of different sizes?  Are there going to be performance issues?
> 
> It should be fine.  Under some circumstances the performance could be similar 
> to a pool with all raidz groups of the smallest size you used (less 
> bandwidth).
> 
> --matt
> 
> > 
> > For example:
> > 
> >   pool: testpool1
> >  state: ONLINE
> >  scrub: none requested
> > config:
> > 
> >         NAME                                        STATE     READ WRITE 
> > CKSUM
> >         testpool1                                   ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> > 
> >           raidz1                                    ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007234685122Ad0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007254685123Cd0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000072F46851256d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073146851266d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073746851278d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074146851292d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000747468512B6d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000749468512C2d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >           raidz1                                    ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074F468512E0d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000751468512E8d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007574685130Cd0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075946851318d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075F4685132Ed0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> >             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000076546851342d0  ONLINE       0     0    
> >  0
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > David
> >  
> >  
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to