-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jean-Philippe Bernardy wrote: > >> Personally, what I'd really like is basic macro support, a Lisp mode, >> and a shell mode. With those three things, most of my Emacs >> functionality would be replicated. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAkk0UmgACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oL8hwCfan3fqmhlbz5Mr9fx31qYbjba fx4AnRgRgoiGMkd3NCkYHIEkv7jty+T/ =+54P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > There is (more or less) a shell mode already. (M-x shell) No, no, I meant a regular mode, as in one I can go and edit .zaliases in - with syntax highlighting and all. Shells are such that it might be mildly useful to integrate M-x shell with it, but it wouldn't be as big a win as with GHCi and Haskell mode. >> Random polish is also quite as valuable as better internal docs; we >> shouldn't be releasing half-broken stuff eg. M-x insertB was broken >> but it seems no one noticed that until I began experimenting with the >> M-x functions (trying to see why 'box replaceString' was failing). > > The interpreter is a damn ugly hack in general, I hope I can put > students to work on it in the spring. :) > > Cheers, > JP. Ah, free developer labor... the best kind. -- gwern --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Yi development mailing list yi-devel@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
