Hello Julien, Jan, Julien Grall writes:
>>>>> On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> wrote: >>> As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able >>> to configure minimal XEN image with >>> >>> make tiny64_defconfig >>> >>> command. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> >> >> you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense >> without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should >> drop these two from my list of pending patches? > > Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a > separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that > documentation patch is going to be sent. Yes, sorry for the delay. I'm going to send resend the series soon. But I can see, that first two patches are already in the staging branch. Should I resend the whole series in this case? Or single patch with the missing documentation will be sufficient? And another, slightly related question: I'm not sure what to do with my patch to get_maintainer.pl script. Should I resend the new version? Jan had comments only to commit message... -- Best regards,Volodymyr Babchuk _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
