>>> On 10.06.19 at 22:03, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6/5/19 5:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>   > On 05/06/2019 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Julien,
>>>
>>>>>> On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> wrote:
>>>> As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able
>>>> to configure minimal XEN image with
>>>>
>>>>   make tiny64_defconfig
>>>>
>>>> command.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>
>>>
>>> you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense
>>> without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should
>>> drop these two from my list of pending patches?
>> 
>> Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a 
>> separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that 
>> documentation patch is going to be sent.
>> 
>> You can consider this as an acked:
>> 
>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> for the two patches.
> 
> I was about to apply the two patches, but I don't seem to be able to 
> apply it because some lines contains =20. AFAICT, it is in replacement 
> of "space" in certain case.

Well, independent of any formatting issues you ought to have trouble
applying them since I did so already.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to