On 6/11/19 10:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 11.06.19 at 11:27, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> On 6/11/19 7:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 10.06.19 at 22:03, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 6/5/19 5:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >>>> > On 05/06/2019 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> Julien, >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> wrote: >>>>>>> As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able >>>>>>> to configure minimal XEN image with >>>>>>> >>>>>>> make tiny64_defconfig >>>>>>> >>>>>>> command. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense >>>>>> without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should >>>>>> drop these two from my list of pending patches? >>>>> >>>>> Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a >>>>> separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that >>>>> documentation patch is going to be sent. >>>>> >>>>> You can consider this as an acked: >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> for the two patches. >>>> >>>> I was about to apply the two patches, but I don't seem to be able to >>>> apply it because some lines contains =20. AFAICT, it is in replacement >>>> of "space" in certain case. >>> >>> Well, independent of any formatting issues you ought to have trouble >>> applying them since I did so already. >> >> Hmm, I missed that. Sorry for noise. >> >> Out of interest, how did you manage to apply it with the =20 in the patch? > > There are no =20 in the mail that I did receive.
I think `git am` knows how to deal with those actually. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
