>>> On 11.06.19 at 11:27, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 6/11/19 7:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 10.06.19 at 22:03, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 6/5/19 5:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >>> > On 05/06/2019 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> Julien, >>>>> >>>>>>>> On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> wrote: >>>>>> As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able >>>>>> to configure minimal XEN image with >>>>>> >>>>>> make tiny64_defconfig >>>>>> >>>>>> command. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com> >>>>> >>>>> you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense >>>>> without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should >>>>> drop these two from my list of pending patches? >>>> >>>> Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a >>>> separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that >>>> documentation patch is going to be sent. >>>> >>>> You can consider this as an acked: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> for the two patches. >>> >>> I was about to apply the two patches, but I don't seem to be able to >>> apply it because some lines contains =20. AFAICT, it is in replacement >>> of "space" in certain case. >> >> Well, independent of any formatting issues you ought to have trouble >> applying them since I did so already. > > Hmm, I missed that. Sorry for noise. > > Out of interest, how did you manage to apply it with the =20 in the patch?
There are no =20 in the mail that I did receive. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
