On 11.09.18 12:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
Should we think about replacing PRI_stime?
Why not, but that would require adding another %p suffix or
introducing a construct splitting s_time_t values into two pieces
(to be used to hide the two printk() arguments required).
I don't think that splitting s_time_i is reasonable.
Introducing %pt for ns granularity and %pT for ms could be an option.
--
*Andrii Anisov*
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
