> On 20 Mar 2023, at 11:01, Christian Lindig <christian.lin...@cloud.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 17 Mar 2023, at 13:19, Luca Fancellu <luca.fance...@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> arch_cap_flags = caml_alloc_small(1, arch_cap_flags_tag);
>> Store_field(arch_cap_flags, 0, arch_cap_list);
>> Store_field(physinfo, 10, arch_cap_flags);
>> +#elif defined(__aarch64__)
>> + Store_field(physinfo, 10, Val_int(c_physinfo.arch_capabilities));
>> +#else
>> + caml_failwith("Unhandled architecture");
>> +#endif
>>
>
> Is this code overwriting an existing entry that was computed but now isn’t
> used? If so, should the conditional compilation not avoid this?
Hi Christian,
I don’t understand, what entry is being overwritten? If I understood it
correctly, I’m writing the position 10 of physinfo
which is not written before.
Cheers,
Luca
>
> — C
