Changlong Xie writes ("[PATCH v11 12/27] tools/libx{l,c}: introduce
wait_checkpoint callback"):
> From: Wen Congyang <we...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
> callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint.
> 0 indicates unexpected error.
This doesn't seem to have a corresponding implementation. I think the
implementation ought to be in the same patch.
If 0 is always an `unexpected error', perhaps the return value should
be an error code or something ? I'm not sure.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
