Yes exactly what I want. I should go with GPL3 or LGPL3 ? On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Mariano Reingart <reing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is not completely true. > > GPL has nothing to do with making money. > GPL do not forces anyone to recommit their code. It only says that if > you make a GPL derivative, you have to offer a way to get the source > code with the modification (only to your customers that received the > software directly from you). > You don't even need to publish it, just give it to your customers (of > course, your customers can give the code to others). > > So, if you just use GPL for a web application, and you don't > distribute that application, you don't have to give the code to > anyone, you can keep it closed with all your "trade secrets". > This will be the use case for most users of Movuca, so they wouldn't > have to worry on republishing code. > > GPL only protect against anyone wishing to take open source code for > free, closing it and sell binary only copies. > That really hurts free software in this case. -- Bruno Rocha [http://rochacbruno.com.br]
