in particular whenever new versions come out ... I always say ... have to wait 1 week or 2 to becomestable ...
unless the new features are highly anticipated and then one is dedicated to testing the system 2010/12/22 KR <kaerbu...@gmail.com> > I support that. > For me the last stable is 1.89.5 (or maybe 1.90.6 ? if the new DAL is > stable) > The only missing stuff is a place to download it. > > On 22 déc, 15:49, Branko Vukelić <stu...@brankovukelic.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, appydev <appy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think there should be a version, not to call it ... , > > > Something likeUbuntu LTS (Long Term Support). and that > > > this version receiveimmediate bug fixes. and other critical > updates that do > > > notprovide new features mean, for a considerable time until thestable > > > version and has been sufficiently tested. > > > > LTS is a completely different ting. It means a lot of backporting of > > stuff that's fixed in later releases, and keeping it supported for 3 > > years. I don't think any framework does it. It's sufficient that we > > have a stable and unstable (or edge, or whatever) versions. The latter > > would be a _released_ version, but is not considered thoroughly > > tested. It's like Debian's unstable->testing->stable cycle. > > > > -- > > Branko Vukelic > > > > stu...@brankovukelic.comhttp://www.brankovukelic.com/ -- Díaz Luis TSU Analisis de Sistemas Universidad de Carabobo http://web2pyfacil.blogspot.com/ Facultad de Odontología<http://www.odontologia.uc.edu.ve/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=102&Itemid=85>
