I support that. For me the last stable is 1.89.5 (or maybe 1.90.6 ? if the new DAL is stable) The only missing stuff is a place to download it.
On 22 déc, 15:49, Branko Vukelić <stu...@brankovukelic.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, appydev <appy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think there should be a version, not to call it ... , > > Something likeUbuntu LTS (Long Term Support). and that > > this version receiveimmediate bug fixes. and other critical updates that do > > notprovide new features mean, for a considerable time until thestable > > version and has been sufficiently tested. > > LTS is a completely different ting. It means a lot of backporting of > stuff that's fixed in later releases, and keeping it supported for 3 > years. I don't think any framework does it. It's sufficient that we > have a stable and unstable (or edge, or whatever) versions. The latter > would be a _released_ version, but is not considered thoroughly > tested. It's like Debian's unstable->testing->stable cycle. > > -- > Branko Vukelic > > stu...@brankovukelic.comhttp://www.brankovukelic.com/
