On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, appydev <appy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think there should be a version, not to call it ... , > Something likeUbuntu LTS (Long Term Support). and that > this version receiveimmediate bug fixes. and other critical updates that do > notprovide new features mean, for a considerable time until thestable > version and has been sufficiently tested.
LTS is a completely different ting. It means a lot of backporting of stuff that's fixed in later releases, and keeping it supported for 3 years. I don't think any framework does it. It's sufficient that we have a stable and unstable (or edge, or whatever) versions. The latter would be a _released_ version, but is not considered thoroughly tested. It's like Debian's unstable->testing->stable cycle. -- Branko Vukelic stu...@brankovukelic.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/
