... Not to mention that I'm not completely convinced that I want to deliver the actual email-like client as part of the project. The thing that excites me is the platform that people can build collaborative tools & systems on top of.
I will probably change the name too. From my original post above: > Maybe the most contentious part of all, I don't think I'd want to call > it wave. But it really would be the grandchild of what we've been > working on all this time. -J On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Coleman <patcole...@google.com> wrote: > The proposal seems to include rewriting the OT stack, changing the > language(s) the client and server are written in, and moving to github. > If this is the case, is there any point in still being called Wave? > > It sounds like not much will be able to be transferred other than knowledge, > so is there any reason to not just create a kickstarter for GentleWare (or > whatever you want to call it :p)? > I guess it is still a wave-y project, but this is kind of like the > Theseus's paradox of project naming. > > (although I'm not that familiar with licensing concerns, so maybe there's > part of the federation protocol or the OT spec which > can only be used by 'Wave' in which case it makes sense).
