On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. <w...@0x1b.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:23 PM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How about platform@ ? >> On Jun 5, 2013 4:59 PM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Except, this isn't for users of WIAB, it is for general discussion about >>> Wave, so user@ doesn't really fit. There are other general@ lists, so >>> there's precedence there. > > your trying to fit the wrong way - do what the other projects have > done so that the unfamiliar face less of a barrier to enter into the > world of Wave.
actually Upayavira is not wrong with his comment. At logging we have a general@logging.a.o list. These kind of lists are not so often, but they exist. Also check the OO mailinstlists: http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html They have a lot different ml. Maybe i was thinking to strict about the naming. > > >>> >>> The other issue though, is that mailing lists work when there's a shared >>> project to discuss. I'm not yet clear what the shared project is that >>> would be discussed on the general@ list - what the shared goal would be. > > how about "how one uses Wave" vs "Conversations about Developing Wave > softwares" > The whole idea is to weed the dev@ list of OT threads by giving them a > place to be. > Just do it and see what shows up. it will be good. > >>> >>> I'd say let's continue the conversations for a while longer, and when >>> the time comes, I can create the list (I have the necessary karma). >>> >>> Upayavira > thanks > >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 08:51 PM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. wrote: >>> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Christian Grobmeier >>> > <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> > >> Following on from the talk, if we intend to develop Apache Wave as an >>> > >> end-product focused project, we should probably migrate talks of >>> > >> 'visions' and 'community' to a separate mailing list from to allow >>> > >> wave-dev to be kept as a developer list related to work on the >>> > >> code-base and documentation. >>> > >> >>> > >> How about would people feel about a wave-general list for the non-dev >>> > >> focused discussions? >>> > > >>> > > Sure, we can give it a try. >>> > > Other apache projects usually have wave-user@ (later to be renamed to >>> > > u...@wave.apache.org) >>> > > >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > > General would be ok too. But I think user would be better, as it >>> > > follows old patterns. If there is a need to for example discuss the >>> > > protocol later and the users list is getting to much traffic it could >>> > > be separated once more. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> Ali >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > http://www.grobmeier.de >>> > > https://www.timeandbill.de >>> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
