Yes, thank you Mark. I agree with Jed.
Mark Gibbs is wrong in his reasoning
It should be clear that there are experimental results that have no
confirmed model to explain them.
This is the history of revolutionary science, which Gibbs should be
aware of.
On 5/30/13 8:27 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Ruby:
I don't think Jed was criticizing your statement,
"Cold fusion has no definitive theory -- as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur
within metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on
a table-top"
it was Gibbs' statement after it which was:
"Unfortunately that's not a sound argument..."
Jed rightfully criticizes Gibbs' statement because it implies that
without a definitive theory, experimental evidence has little weight.
It is a sore point with all LENR followers because it is the opposite
of what science is all about; if repeatable experimental evidence
contradicts theory, then theory may need to be revised/replaced.
Keep up the fight!
-Mark Iverson
*From:*Ruby [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:14 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Gibbs: Rossi's A Fraud! No, He's Not! Yes, He Is!
No, He Isn't!
I wrote that quote...
"Cold fusion has no definitive theory -- as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur
within metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on
a table-top"
http://coldfusionnow.org/discovery-news-misinforms-on-cold-fusion-again/
.. and stand by it.--
Ruby Carat
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org <http://www.coldfusionnow.org>
