On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > That is completely wrong. In experimental science you never need to explain > how something works in order to confirm it is real. You just need to > replicate it and show there is no error in the instruments or techniques.
The map = Theory The territory = Experiments It's not on the map = No good theory If it's not on the map, it can't exist! (Our map makers are very good.) = It doesn't fit physics thus it's pseudo-science! (Our scientists are very good.) -- Berke Durak
