Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> And I always have to remind you that there are probably many potential > methods to cheat we may not have thought of. > You do not have to remind me of that. I have to remind *you* that is a violation of the scientific method. It is proposition that cannot be tested or falsified. It is like saying there is probably an invisible undetectable fairy godmother hovering in the air causing these effects. I find it incredible that you still do not understand this. An argument is not valid or meaningful *at all* unless you can describe some specific means of testing it and proving it is true -- or false. No one can prove that "there are probably potential methods." You have to list actual methods. You might as well claim "there are probably potential methods of proving that the world is flat." Okay, show us the methods! - Jed
