Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suspect you will take wild notions like mine more seriously if much more > time passes without any absolutely definitive determination of Rossi's > veracity. > I consider the Oct. 6 test definitive. The chance of fraud is so low I do not take that seriously. It is no more likely than a supernatural event. Neither you nor any other skeptic has suggested any viable reason why this demonstration was not definitive. You have never come up with a method of committing fraud. If you could suggest a method, you would have done so by now. You are asking us to believe in fraud with a trace of evidence for it. Not a trace! You are a true believer clinging to an absurd hypothesis that is contrary to the laws of physics. - Jed
