Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I consider the Oct. 6 test definitive. >> > > Many capable scientists and engineers do not agree. > I have not heard from any yet. There has to be a time limit for these things. As Melich and I wrote regarding cold fusion in general: ". . . [S]keptics have had 20 years to expose an experimental artifact, but they have failed to do so. A reasonable time limit to find errors must be set, or results from decades or centuries ago will remain in limbo, forever disputed, and progress will ground to a halt. The calorimeters used by cold fusion researchers were developed in the late 18th and early 19th century. A skeptic who asserts that scientists cannot measure multiple watts of heat with confidence is, in effect, rejecting most textbook chemistry and physics from the last 130 years." > The measurement method was questionable and unverified and the run was way > too short. > Nonsense. It was 4 hours long. You can tell at a glance that the reactor would have reached room temperature after 40 min. You can repeat this nonsense as many times as you like but the graphs show you are wrong. Everyday experience with boiling water in poorly insulated pots proves you are wrong. You should think about the evidence and basic physics and stop repeating absurdities. And stop obsessing with Rossi personality. Enough already. - Jed
