On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> There is no need to postulate energy storage in the megawatt plant >> demonstration. It is only necessary to consider that Rossi's client may be >> fictitious and that the engineer may work for Rossi, perhaps for quite a >> very large fee or share. >> > > In other words, you have to believe in conspiracy theories. Which I do not. > > Unless you have some evidence for these wild notions, I cannot take them > seriously. > > Of course, you don't have to take them seriously. A lot of Irish farmers did not seriously consider fraud with the Steorn situation and so far, in something like four years, they have lost 20 million Euros with nothing whatever to show for it. Steorn's CEO and a few upper echelon employees have, I am sure, enjoyed spending their money. Rossi for the most part, talks and walks like Steorn did early on. Earlier in this discussion, I have named other scams that operated similarly including such notables as convicted felons Dennis Lee and Carl Tilley (multiple convictions). I suspect you will take wild notions like mine more seriously if much more time passes without any absolutely definitive determination of Rossi's veracity. Of course, Rossi could dispel the wild notions in a comparatively short time and at low cost and low risk to his intellectual property. He could also dispel them instantly -- simply by giving an E-cat for testing to any university and allowing them to make a quick test of whether or not it works as advertised and to report the results. That he doesn't do that is very suspicious and excuses about his not wanting to get more attention or to reveal secrets are not persuasive for a whole bunch of reasons we have discussed before.
