Both the LENR reactor and the quantum computer are both exquisite nearly identical quantum mechanical devices. They both could be designed in the same way. The Mizumo LENR reactor is based on a regular lattice of optical micro cavities on which polaritons form based on a fine meshed palladium coated nickel screen. A very low pressured (.003 bar) deuterium atmosphere provides an isotopically pure insulation layer which enables polaritons to form. The polariton energy pumping method to eneable the polariton condensates to form is rendered through the application of heat.
All the millions of polaritons form a condensate of condensates which all become entangled globally. In the reactor, excess heat is produced when the entanglement condition is broken. In the computer the answer is also rendered when the entanglement is broken. On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:15 AM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > Moving forward – this month of July could be unusually hot, to speak… > Energy Independence Day could be upon us. > > > > Several top researchers are now committed to a Mizuno replication and > underway already. Even more are thinking seriously about parts of it - and > there are literally dozens of crafty amateurs who want to make a big > splash. Who knows what will happen by Fall? The only thing missing, sadly, > is participation from DOE and the big labs (with the possible exception of > Lawrence Berkeley.) > > > > Few of the researchers want to be identified at this time by name - but > the explosion of interest in this experiment is like nothing we have seen > in the field since the early days of the Rossi debacle. If this turns out > to be another false alarm – LENR may never recover. > > > > Most of the pundits on this forum are willing to give benefit of the doubt > to Mizuno, and take a wait-and-see attitude, despite similar claims from > him in the past which did not pan out. Some of that tolerance is because of > a realizable hope for an increase in the basic understanding of LENR even > if the effect is not as robust as claimed. In contrast, Rossi disappeared > from relevance with negative, decreased understanding. > > > > To that end, the one old lesson which is standing-out comes from a > reanalysis of the original Widom Larsen work of 14 years ago. Admittedly, > the big thing they got wrong was the ultra low momentum neutron but not the > rest of it. That species now seems both imaginary and useless, but the two > valuable insights which they got right are the surface plasmon interaction > with protons and the need for framing a multi-step reaction to take the > place of deuterium fusion. It is clear from Mizuno that his technique works > with both protium and deuterium with no neutron activation, even after long > runs at high power. Nuclear fusion is most unlikely, but not another kind > of nuclear reaction. > > > > IMHO, the main thing which W&L overlooked is the “cluster” of many atoms > as being the key to the multi-step process – and not some mysterious cold > neutron. The cluster of many atoms bound together with borrowed electron > energy can resonate with surface plasmons whereas the atoms themselves are > much too small to couple. The energy which is released in a subsequent > “Coulomb explosion” is then a type of nuclear binding energy modeled on QCD > and the strong force. > > > > But at least nailing the surface plasmon step by W&L was a major advance… > which was never capitalized on, and which Mizuno seems to have stumbled on > in his experiment serendipitously. > > > > As they say in Sapporo (or was that Paris) “chance favors the prepared > mind.” > > > > If this pre-analysis is even half-way on target, Mizuno switched from glow > discharge to incandescent photon input power pretty much by trial and > error, or even by accident or desperation; and he may not have realized at > the time the importance of the palladium absorption anomaly in the red > spectrum. > > > > I’m anticipating a red hot July … >
