Recent experiments involving compression of deuterium using laser pulses has shown that ultra dense deuterium frond through laser compression can remain quantum mechanically coherent up to a temperature of 90.000F.
https://www.futurity.org/plasma-liquid-metal-physics-2003862/ WHEN LIQUID METAL TURNS TO PLASMA, THE PHYSICS GET WEIRD On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:08 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Steven N. Karels > July 2, 2019 at 4:31 AM > > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=434#comment-1375785> > > Dear Andrea, > > I have difficulty with your limited answer and I suspect others might > also have questions and/or are experiencing confusion. > > I understand there are two primary ways of deriving energy from the > nucleus – fission and fusion. I suspect you are concerned with protecting > your confidential business secrets and that is fine and understandable. > > But the implication that I would draw from your comment is that the > reaction is fission which cannot be the correct answer because of the low > atomic number of the ingredients. > > Confused, > > Steve > 2. Translate > > Andrea Rossi > July 2, 2019 at 8:21 AM > > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=434#comment-1375841> > > Steven N. Karels: > There are other nuclear interactions, besides fusion and fission. > See also > > > http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The connection missing since decades was the fact that super-conduction >> is spin-current and not electron flux and not copper pair flux. >> Hirsch first found the connection between spin current and SC when he >> could improve the description of the Meissner effect. After the latest >> experiments by Holmlid and the work of H. Esat Kondakci 1,2 & Ayman F. >> Abouraddy1 >> about group velocity > 60c it is clear that the orbit of light inside >> matter is a spin orbit. >> From my work it is clear that the metric of SO(4) allows to explain the >> acceleration of the group velocity. The 3D/4D flux, that couples with >> matter, makes 8 rotations before getting back to origin this allows for an >> about 27 times shorter path (radius = 1/2!) for light = its mass (use >> mass orbit relation) moving along an SO(4) orbit. >> The connections people did talk about seems to be the true orbit of >> photons inside matter, that can be modeled by 3 rotations. >> >> BEC is key for the formation of larger coupled spin orbits. The classic >> electron of Hydrogen/Deuterium mostly runs in one plane equivalent orbit. >> The electron pair of 4-He runs on a SO(4) orbit. This first condensation >> step of an electron allows to get rid of about 10.8 eV, what leads to a >> reduction of the orbit radius. This amount of energy 10.8 eV is also the >> "optical energy" such a bond can temporary store in the energy-hole left >> behind. >> >> If larger orbits form out the number of possible pairs does increase and >> also the total sum of energy increases. The critical energy to trigger a >> "proton magnetic moment relaxation" is 1001eV. If this counter mass rotates >> along a proton spin orbit the proton can get rid of 2002eV what leads to >> 2.15pm radius state Holmlid reports. In this process two condensed >> (paired) deuterium nuclei release the so called dark matter signal energy >> of around 3.5keV. >> The 1001eV resonance energy of the proton has been found in three >> different experiments. >> >> BEC at room temperature and up to several hundred degrees is allowed by >> classic theory already if you lower the pressure (as Holmlid does) and use >> a cavity = hole in surface, that reduces the degrees of freedom for moving >> mass from 3 to 1 then 3/2kt becomes 0.5kt. >> >> For me the LENR picture is almost complete. One thing I would like to >> add. According to my calculations >> the 61-Ni magnetic state that couples in the Mizuno reaction, induces a >> magnetic energy equivalent of the H/D orbit magnetic energy what tells us >> that the final LENR energy release process is thermalizing using the base >> electron orbit of hydrogen/deuterium. >> >> Jürg Wyttenbach >> >> Am 02.07.19 um 16:03 schrieb JonesBeene: >> >> >> >> Is there a strong connection between computer design and LENR? The >> connection may be non-obvious for now, but in a few months it may be state >> of the art, right Axil? >> >> >> >> Here is a News story from yesterday which may explain Axil’s recent >> observation of a novel QM connection between the Mizuno setup to the >> emerging architecture of the quantum computer. >> >> >> >> At least the research is novel to me, and since is on a different end >> use with different parameters, the connection may end up being “ by >> analogy” or not. I seem to have lost the original message but the Wang >> research on supercurrents is here >> >> >> >> >> https://phys.org/news/2019-07-physicists-supercurrents-enable-ultrafast-quantum.html >> >> >> https://phys.org/news/2018-06-physicists-terahertz-uncover-state-hidden.html >> >> Wang et al from Iowa State University claim “light-induced >> superconductivity without energy gap.” That seems to be right on target for >> a Mizuno explanation too especially if the supercurrent is related to a >> palladium nanoparticle only and NOT the bulk structure. >> >> IOW we have “local superconductivity” of palladium hydride at 400° F with >> extreme and self-contained supercurrents within in the nanoparticle. Wang >> mentions terahertz oscillation and symmetry breaking – which is another >> clue about the nature of gain. >> >> Photons are the only elementary particles which routinely form into >> condensates (BEC) at high temperature, setting the stage for a “proximity” >> effect as in the Mizuno reactor. >> >> https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.4.0888/full/ >> >> Since Palladium hydride is itself a superconductor at low temperature it >> may function to retain that state at much higher temperature when in close >> proximity to another superconductor (the photon BEC). Perhaps the >> combination of the two results in superconductivity at elevated temperature >> within the dimensions of a nanoparticle via the known proximity effect but >> limited to the nanoparticle (or Qubit/exciton structure) >> >> In the Weitz study cited above the photon wavelength is not the same as >> the palladium optical anomaly but it is close enough to considered an >> identical situation. He does not limit the effect to a single wavelength. >> >> This all fits together rather elegantly. That does not make it correct, >> but it makes infinitely more sense than actual nuclear fusion to explain >> anomalous heat. >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Moving forward – this month of July could be unusually hot, to speak… >> Energy Independence Day could be upon us. >> >> >> >> Several top researchers are now committed to a Mizuno replication and >> underway already. Even more are thinking seriously about parts of it - and >> there are literally dozens of crafty amateurs who want to make a big >> splash. Who knows what will happen by Fall? The only thing missing, sadly, >> is participation from DOE and the big labs (with the possible exception of >> Lawrence Berkeley.) >> >> >> >> Few of the researchers want to be identified at this time by name - but >> the explosion of interest in this experiment is like nothing we have seen >> in the field since the early days of the Rossi debacle. If this turns out >> to be another false alarm – LENR may never recover. >> >> >> >> Most of the pundits on this forum are willing to give benefit of the >> doubt to Mizuno, and take a wait-and-see attitude, despite similar claims >> from him in the past which did not pan out. Some of that tolerance is >> because of a realizable hope for an increase in the basic understanding of >> LENR even if the effect is not as robust as claimed. In contrast, Rossi >> disappeared from relevance with negative, decreased understanding. >> >> >> >> To that end, the one old lesson which is standing-out comes from a >> reanalysis of the original Widom Larsen work of 14 years ago. Admittedly, >> the big thing they got wrong was the ultra low momentum neutron but not the >> rest of it. That species now seems both imaginary and useless, but the two >> valuable insights which they got right are the surface plasmon interaction >> with protons and the need for framing a multi-step reaction to take the >> place of deuterium fusion. It is clear from Mizuno that his technique works >> with both protium and deuterium with no neutron activation, even after long >> runs at high power. Nuclear fusion is most unlikely, but not another kind >> of nuclear reaction. >> >> >> >> IMHO, the main thing which W&L overlooked is the “cluster” of many atoms >> as being the key to the multi-step process – and not some mysterious cold >> neutron. The cluster of many atoms bound together with borrowed electron >> energy can resonate with surface plasmons whereas the atoms themselves are >> much too small to couple. The energy which is released in a subsequent >> “Coulomb explosion” is then a type of nuclear binding energy modeled on QCD >> and the strong force. >> >> >> >> But at least nailing the surface plasmon step by W&L was a major advance… >> which was never capitalized on, and which Mizuno seems to have stumbled on >> in his experiment serendipitously. >> >> >> >> As they say in Sapporo (or was that Paris) “chance favors the prepared >> mind.” >> >> >> >> If this pre-analysis is even half-way on target, Mizuno switched from >> glow discharge to incandescent photon input power pretty much by trial and >> error, or even by accident or desperation; and he may not have realized at >> the time the importance of the palladium absorption anomaly in the red >> spectrum. >> >> >> >> I’m anticipating a red hot July … >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jürg Wyttenbach >> Bifangstr.22 >> 8910 Affoltern a.A. >> 044 760 14 18 >> 079 246 36 06 >> >>
