Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote:
> The first article says: >> <<The episode is now largely remembered as a case study in confirmation >> bias <https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01673-x>. >> >> > > Well at least they aren't using the scathing term pathological science. >> > > And for that I am grateful and thusly do not use the term 'cognitive > dissonance'. :) > Well said! Plus, you notice, they didn't say which way the confirmation bias went. - Jed
