On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 1:02 PM H LV <[email protected]> wrote: > The first article says: > <<The episode is now largely remembered as a case study in confirmation > bias <https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01673-x>. >> > > Well at least they aren't using the scathing term pathological science. >
And for that I am grateful and thusly do not use the term 'cognitive dissonance'. :)
