Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: By the way, from what you read about the work of that team, was failure > predictable ? >
I do not think they are finished, so it should not be called a failure yet. They probably did not achieve high loading. See this interview with one of the authors: http://news.mit.edu/2019/3q-yet-ming-chiang-reopening-the-case-of-cold-fusion-0527#.XOw6HEe8lbU.twitter > do you know if they contacted experienced actors of the domain ? > Trevithick attended several ICCF conferences. I believe he and McKubre are friends. > Did they test fuel from other team (like the Japanese, or IH scientists?) > Good question. I do not know. It isn't fuel they need to test. It is cathodes, such as the ones made by Violante. I do not know if they are still available. > What I have seen is usual hate speech by Nature&co, and great enthusiasm > shown by Berlinguette group just a "work in progress"... > Yes. As I said, alert readers of *Nature* may ask themselves: Why is *Nature* so upset about this? Why is there so much doubletalk in the paper, to cover up the fact that this has been replicated? Here is a question not many readers have asked themselves: "What is this LENR-CANR.org website?" Traffic has not increased noticeably. - Jed
