I wonder if the MIT folks talked with Peter and Mitchell at MIT? Either or both may have some good ideas for the Google collaboration or lack thereof.
Did Google mandate the secrecy of the various individual efforts? Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:47:17 AM To: Vortex Subject: Re: [Vo]:Berlinguette, C.P., et al., Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion. Nature, 2019 Alain Sepeda <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: By the way, from what you read about the work of that team, was failure predictable ? I do not think they are finished, so it should not be called a failure yet. They probably did not achieve high loading. See this interview with one of the authors: http://news.mit.edu/2019/3q-yet-ming-chiang-reopening-the-case-of-cold-fusion-0527#.XOw6HEe8lbU.twitter do you know if they contacted experienced actors of the domain ? Trevithick attended several ICCF conferences. I believe he and McKubre are friends. Did they test fuel from other team (like the Japanese, or IH scientists?) Good question. I do not know. It isn't fuel they need to test. It is cathodes, such as the ones made by Violante. I do not know if they are still available. What I have seen is usual hate speech by Nature&co, and great enthusiasm shown by Berlinguette group just a "work in progress"... Yes. As I said, alert readers of Nature may ask themselves: Why is Nature so upset about this? Why is there so much doubletalk in the paper, to cover up the fact that this has been replicated? Here is a question not many readers have asked themselves: "What is this LENR-CANR.org website?" Traffic has not increased noticeably. - Jed
