> -----Original Message----- > I have found the browser (on NT anyway) is much faster than the > viewer/server connection. AS we are running a slow speed > connection, any > improvement in speed is significant. I have found that in > general Linux is > faster then W32 as well so am hoping this will work better > than what I have > now!!
Always look for the bottleneck if you need more speed. In most cases Linux is faster than W32 but is that realy your bottleneck? If any public network is involved, that is most likely the bottleneck. So either update the bandwith there or reduce the need by using better/higher compression. > > There is nothing but the standard 58xx/59xx port mapping in > place, and a > tight firewall on both ends is in place. Also using ssh2 for > security, but > want to expand to tunnelling and compression eventually. But > hey its one > step at a time for me!! Found this works best and also to > keep everything as > standard as possible. BE WARNED: if you do portmapping from 59xx to 58xx, this might mingle with the default webbrowser on port 58xx for every server on 59xx. Better take an other range (NOT 60xx, that range is reserved for X11!) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
