Koronka Akos wrote:
>
> It's ok to take focus on core devel, but adding a plug-in handling will make
> easier to combine several very-very good features, what is now in different
> packages.
> I think so many people will make plugins if this handling is available. Like
> far manager, or winamp plugins.
>
> So what about plugins?
I agree wholeheartedly. If VNC had a plugin architecture that
would allow us to extend RFB and the UI without touching the server
source,
a lot of these threads would be reduced to "go get the [file transfer|
encryption|HTTP tunnelling] plugin from http://....". This does not
seem like an insanely difficult thing to implement.
-- Joe
> RS.
> Koronka Akos
-- Joe Knapka
"It was just a maddened crocodile hidden in a flower bed. It could
have happened to anyone." -- Pratchett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
