Hi,
did anyone use the Tight Encoder Version a lot? Is it stable enough? The
author states on his homepage, that he didn't run or test it, and that
there's no support for it availible.
Bevor we deploy it to LOTS of machines, I'd like to know, if there are any
known issues with that version.
Since we mainly have 64k/128k lines, we need some kind of effective
compression, and I found (subjective) tight the fastest.
Lars
----------------------------------------------
Lars Oeschey - Media Saturn GFI
Projektleitung Tivoli
visit WARKRAFT @ http://www.mp3.com/warkraft
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
