On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:06:17 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Actually I wonder if there's a performance benefit to this case label >> implementation anymore. It was added when there was once a hope of >> replacing the template interpreter with this one. > >> This code doesn't change so the merge with valhalla would be zero if it was >> 4 bytecodes per line. > > I am confused to what this means? > This code must change with Valhalla as it adds two new internal bytecodes > `fast_vgetfield` and `fast_vputfield`. Yeah, please keep the table formatting intact. For one thing, it obscures what you are semantically changing in the table? I understand it would be uglier, but that's OK. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2068#discussion_r2811309662
