The radio TX frontend backpressures upstream blocks. You don't have to
worry about providing samples at the frontend rate. There is no reason to
use a 200MHz clock in your block.

Remember: if the frontend is operating at 200Msps, then the samples your
block is producing must assume a 200Msps sample rate. It doesn't matter at
all that the clock driving your block is 214MHz -- that only means that the
logic is operating a bit faster.

Nick

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:58 AM Cherif Diouf via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Hello guys,
>
>
>
> I am working with the X310 USRP. I have developed customed RFNoC CEs
> running at ce_clk which is no more 200 MHz but rather 214 MHz.
>
> So my blocks are providing samples to the RF frontends at 214 MSps. Is
> that right?
>
> Then how the operation can be consistent when the sampling rate of the RF
> frontends is still at 200MSps.
>
>
> Is it possible to synchronize both the 214 MHz and the 200 MHz clocks to
> the same 10 MHz external reference, or to  use the 200 MHz reference clock
> as my HW blocks main clock?
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Cherif
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to