Sorry typo. I did use a frequency of 3.51GHz. 

> On 5 Dec 2018, at 12:54, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Florian,
> 
> trying to get my head to understand the order of problems here:
> Could you try to use a higher frequency (say, --freq 2e9 instead of
> 3.5e6)? 
> I'd thing 3.51 MHz is out of range for the N310, anyway?
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcus
> 
> On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 11:49 +0100, Florian Kaltenberger via USRP-users
> wrote:
>> So I can confirm that there is a frequency offset between the two
>> USRP N310s when using only an octoclock (10MHz + PPS) to synchronize.
>> I have measured with the tx_waveforms program
>> ./tx_waveforms --args
>> "addr=192.168.x.2,time_src=external,clock_src=external,master_clock_r
>> ate=122.88e6" --rate 122.88e6 --freq 3.51e6 --wave-type SINE --wave-
>> freq 10e6 --gain 100 
>> on the first USRP N310 (x=10) and then on the other (x=20). There is
>> an offset of 1200Hz between the peaks of the sinusoids between the
>> two measurements. 
>> Using an external LO didn't change anything either. Unless I need to
>> provide any other arguments in that case?
>> I also tried to do a test where I use both USRPs simultaneously
>> ./tx_waveforms --args
>> "addr0=192.168.10.2,addr1=192.168.20.2,time_src=external,clock_src=ex
>> ternal,master_clock_rate=122.88e6" --rate 122.88e6 --freq 3.51e6 --
>> wave-type SINE --wave-freq 10e6 --gain 100--channels "0,4"
>> but unfortunately that does not work at all at my testbench (program
>> hangs and no signal transmitted). 
>> My UHD version is 3.13.0.2 (UHD_3.13.0.HEAD-0-g0ddc19e5)
>> Any help appreciated.
>> Thanks!
>> Florian.
>> 
>>> On 04/12/2018 21:29, Florian Kaltenberger via USRP-users wrote:
>>> Hi Marcus and Robin,
>>> thanks for your answers, this is helpful information. I should add,
>>> that I actually tried the synchronization with an octoclock (10MHz
>>> + PPS), but it did not give me the expected results, i.e., I saw
>>> some residual frequency offsets. But maybe I screwed up at some
>>> point. Let me do some more measurements and get back to you on
>>> this. 
>>> Florian. 
>>> 
>>>> On 04/12/2018 18:57, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote:
>>>> On 12/04/2018 10:14 AM, Florian Kaltenberger via USRP-users
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>> I just discovered that in addition to the external 10MHz
>>>>> reference in, the USRP N310 also has external local oscilator
>>>>> inputs, one for each daughterboard and each TX/RX. So does that
>>>>> mean that in order to synchronize multiple N310 in frequency,
>>>>> phase, and time, it is no longer sufficient to use an octoclock
>>>>> to provide a 10MHz reference and PPS? If so, at what frequency
>>>>> do you have to drive the external LOs and at what power?
>>>>> Florian.
>>>>> 
>>>> In addition to what Robin posted, I'll observe that the external
>>>> LO port is an *additional feature* of this device.
>>>> 
>>>> You should still be able to use the external 10MHz and 1PPS ports
>>>> the same way you would with a B210 or E310, since the AD9371
>>>>  front-end chip is similar to the AD9361 chip used in the B210
>>>> and E310.
>>>> 
>>>> The thing about synchronizing multiple independent PLL
>>>> synthesizers, though, compared to a strictly-shared-LO, is that
>>>> the former will
>>>>  experience both phase ambiguities, and have a higher mutual
>>>> phase-noise than the latter, which is why you might decide to
>>>> choose
>>>>  the latter.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Follow us on Google+, LinkedIn, or Twitter!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>> 
>> -- 
>> Follow us on Google+, LinkedIn, or Twitter!
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
> 


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to