Driven from pins 14 and 15 (10MEG_R_P/N) of SY89547 from page 12….that page of 
FPGA pinning is redacted because it contains other proprietary info that NI 
doesn’t want to release.
-Ian


> On Jun 19, 2018, at 8:20 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users 
> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> 
> Just to clarify source of FPGA_REFCLK_10MHz_p/n signals (pins AG24, AH24). I 
> have not found them in the schematic. Do they come from SY89547 or from 
> LMK04816?
> 
> thanks,
> Dmitry
> 
> пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 22:27, Ian Buckley via USRP-users 
> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>:
> Dmitry ,
> Yes that will cause you some pain. In this specific case the internal details 
> of the X310 are important. 
> The PPS is first sampled by a synchronizer (chain of registers) clocked with 
> the REF_CLK. But then there is a secondary synchronizer to the DSP clock, 
> which in the case of your modified UHD, is asynchronous w.r.t the 10MHz 
> REF_CLK, so there is again a hazard of a violation of setup/hold timing on 
> that secondary synchronizer as the relative phases shift with respect to each 
> other, and hence a potential ambiguity as to which clock edge samples the PPS 
> on each device. You might need a custom FPGA image to solve for your 
> particular configuration, it’s a tricky timing problem.
> (Of course something else also may also be going on….custom 
> configuration=custom problems!)
> -Ian
> 
>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users 
>> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> OK. Now I am trying to synchronize channels on UBX only boards. I am able to 
>> get them synchronized if I use default master clock rate 200 MHz.
>> For my test I use modified UHD driver that allows to set 122.88 MHz master 
>> clock. It seems that phase sync procedure does not work in that case.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Dmitry
>> 
>> пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 18:22, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users 
>> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>:
>> On 06/18/2018 10:57 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
>>> Is it important to have PPS signal aligned with reference 10 MHz signal. In 
>>> my case they come from different sources.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> Dmitry?
>> Something to be aware of though is that trying to achieve fine phase 
>> synchronization (with predictable phase offset) between two
>>   entirely-different synthesizer types is not likely to be all that 
>> satisfying.
>> 
>> Different types of synthesizers will interpret the re-synch pulse sent by 
>> the FPGA in slightly different ways, so achieving very-tight
>>   synchronization between different board types is not likely to work.
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 17:37, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users 
>>> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>:
>>> On 06/18/2018 10:28 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
>>>> The frequency is around 600 MHz. I also tried higher frequencies. The 
>>>> offset is visible on picture attached.
>>>> 
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Dmitry
>>> If you look here:
>>> 
>>> https://kb.ettus.com/UBX <https://kb.ettus.com/UBX>
>>> 
>>> You can see that for frequencies below 1GHz, you have to use a 20MHz 
>>> daughterboard clock for UBX to achieve synchronization.
>>>   I don't know if SBX will work correctly with a 20MHz daughterboard clock, 
>>> so you can't have "mixed" UBX + SBX on the same
>>>   X310.
>>> 
>>> Also, integer-N tuning can help maintain better phase synchronization 
>>> characteristics:
>>> 
>>> https://files.ettus.com/manual/structuhd_1_1tune__request__t.html 
>>> <https://files.ettus.com/manual/structuhd_1_1tune__request__t.html>
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 14:50, Дмитрий Михайличенко <mdm...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:mdm...@gmail.com>>:
>>>> Hi, 
>>>> 
>>>> I have a couple of X310 each of them has UBX+SBX cards. The devices are 
>>>> synchronized by external 10MHz + PPS signal. But in my test I see random 
>>>> phase delay between all channels that varies between test runs. The test 
>>>> creates multi usrp device, sets up time and tunes to the same frequency 
>>>> using timed command, then it captures some buffers. The same external 
>>>> signal is supplied to all antenna ports. Is it expected to have random 
>>>> delay between channels? Is there any way to have constant phase delay from 
>>>> run to run?
>>>> 
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Dmitry
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
>>>> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
>>> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
>>> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
>> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
>> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
  • Re: [USRP-users] tw... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
    • Re: [USRP-user... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
      • Re: [USRP-... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
        • Re: [U... Daniel Jepson via USRP-users
          • Re... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
            • ... Ian Buckley via USRP-users
      • Re: [USRP-... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
        • Re: [U... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
          • Re... Ian Buckley via USRP-users
            • ... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
            • ... Ian Buckley via USRP-users
            • ... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users

Reply via email to