On 06/18/2018 10:57 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
Is it important to have PPS signal aligned with reference 10 MHz signal. In my case they come from different sources.

thanks,
Dmitry?
Something to be aware of though is that trying to achieve fine phase synchronization (with predictable phase offset) between two entirely-different synthesizer types is not likely to be all that satisfying.

Different types of synthesizers will interpret the re-synch pulse sent by the FPGA in slightly different ways, so achieving very-tight
  synchronization between different board types is not likely to work.



пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 17:37, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>:

    On 06/18/2018 10:28 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
    The frequency is around 600 MHz. I also tried higher frequencies.
    The offset is visible on picture attached.

    thanks,
    Dmitry
    If you look here:

    https://kb.ettus.com/UBX

    You can see that for frequencies below 1GHz, you have to use a
    20MHz daughterboard clock for UBX to achieve synchronization.
      I don't know if SBX will work correctly with a 20MHz
    daughterboard clock, so you can't have "mixed" UBX + SBX on the same
      X310.

    Also, integer-N tuning can help maintain better phase
    synchronization characteristics:

    https://files.ettus.com/manual/structuhd_1_1tune__request__t.html


    пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 14:50, Дмитрий Михайличенко
    <mdm...@gmail.com <mailto:mdm...@gmail.com>>:

        Hi,

        I have a couple of X310 each of them has UBX+SBX cards. The
        devices are synchronized by external 10MHz + PPS signal. But
        in my test I see random phase delay between all channels that
        varies between test runs. The test creates multi usrp device,
        sets up time and tunes to the same frequency using timed
        command, then it captures some buffers. The same external
        signal is supplied to all antenna ports. Is it expected to
        have random delay between channels? Is there any way to have
        constant phase delay from run to run?

        thanks,
        Dmitry



    _______________________________________________
    USRP-users mailing list
    USRP-users@lists.ettus.com  <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
    http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

    _______________________________________________
    USRP-users mailing list
    USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
    http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com



_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
  • [USRP-users] two X3... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
    • Re: [USRP-user... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
    • Re: [USRP-user... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
      • Re: [USRP-... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
        • Re: [U... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
          • Re... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
            • ... Daniel Jepson via USRP-users
              • ... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
                • ... Ian Buckley via USRP-users
          • Re... Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
            • ... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
              • ... Ian Buckley via USRP-users
                • ... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users
                • ... Ian Buckley via USRP-users
                • ... Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users

Reply via email to