Hi Andrew, First, maint was just updated with the fix for the LFTX and LFRX boards on X3x0.
Second, yes, you can install multiple installations of UHD by setting the CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX different for each installation. You will have to set the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables appropriately to switch between them. Regards, Michael On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:43 AM, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Michael. Do you know if I were to install rfnoc under a different > prefix would the UHD version be able to be switched between the prefixes? > I'm using an older rfnoc build compatible with Vivado 2015.4 and hesitant > to install the latest build and checkout that new fix if it it will > overwrite the older UHD version. > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Michael West <michael.w...@ettus.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> The fix is on the master branch (commit 8922095 >> <https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8922095b2c3a8dd1c764d7b80d3128c44721597b>). >> It is being included in the next set of commits on the maint branch that >> should be available in the next few days. >> >> Regards, >> Michael >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:13 PM, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> I see new commits have been entered in the uhd maint branch in the last >>> couple days. Were any related to this issue? >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Michael West <michael.w...@ettus.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Louis/Andrew, >>>> >>>> The root cause of the issue has been identified and a fix is in >>>> progress. We should have the fix available on the head of the maint branch >>>> very soon. Thank you for bringing it to our attention! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:54 AM, switchlanez via USRP-users < >>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have an issue that may be related. Using LFTX and LFRX boards in an >>>>> X310, anytime I use the RFNoC Radio block in Rx mode the run terminates >>>>> with: >>>>> >>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' >>>>> what(): map::at >>>>> >>>>> Following for updates. >>>>> >>>>> Andrew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Neel Pandeya via USRP-users < >>>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Louis: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the detailed feedback. We have reproduced this issue, and >>>>>> are debugging it now. We will get back to you and post an update shortly. >>>>>> >>>>>> --​Neel Pandeya >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12 April 2018 at 18:46, Louis Brown via USRP-users < >>>>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Could it be something to do with this commit for address offsets? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8ee22529f33a63c2 >>>>>>> 064b0dc6fbcc04c2ded94b4a >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2018, at 16:38, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did something change with respect to daughter board addressing in >>>>>>> UHD 3.11? >>>>>>> I have an X310 with LFTX and LFRX in motherboard slot A. >>>>>>> When I run benchmark_rate it core dumps as follows: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args >>>>>>> "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=10E6 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat >>>>>>> 7.3.1-5); Boost_106400; UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown >>>>>>> [00:00:00.000006] Creating the usrp device with: addr=192.168.40.2... >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence... >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Determining maximum frame size... >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes. >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Setup basic communication... >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Loading values from EEPROM... >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Setup RF frontend clocking... >>>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock:200 >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 0... >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1299 MB/s) >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 1... >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1302 MB/s) >>>>>>> [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_0] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 >>>>>>> input ports >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed >>>>>>> [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_1] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 >>>>>>> input ports >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed >>>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed >>>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... >>>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed >>>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... >>>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed >>>>>>> Using Device: Single USRP: >>>>>>> Device: X-Series Device >>>>>>> Mboard 0: X310 >>>>>>> RX Channel: 0 >>>>>>> RX DSP: 0 >>>>>>> RX Dboard: A >>>>>>> RX Subdev: LFRX (AB) >>>>>>> RX Channel: 1 >>>>>>> RX DSP: 0 >>>>>>> RX Dboard: B >>>>>>> RX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0 >>>>>>> TX Channel: 0 >>>>>>> TX DSP: 0 >>>>>>> TX Dboard: A >>>>>>> TX Subdev: LFTX (AB) >>>>>>> TX Channel: 1 >>>>>>> TX DSP: 0 >>>>>>> TX Dboard: B >>>>>>> TX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [00:00:02.623786] Setting device timestamp to 0... >>>>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' >>>>>>> what(): map::at >>>>>>> Aborted (core dumped) >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I specify tx_channels "1" it runs, lighting up the slot B TX/RX >>>>>>> LED, or course I have no boards installed there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args >>>>>>> "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=100E6 --tx_channels "1" >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I specify tx_channels "0" it core dumps with the same >>>>>>> std::out_of_range >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Flow graphs that ran in UHD 3.10 with sub-device "A:AB" no longer >>>>>>> run: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed >>>>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' >>>>>>> what(): map::at >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I try benchmark_rate with another X310 with the UBX card in slot >>>>>>> A, things work fine. So maybe it's specific to the use of LF cards with >>>>>>> UHD 3.11. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> USRP-users mailing list >>>>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >>>>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> USRP-users mailing list >>>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >>>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> USRP-users mailing list >>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
