Hi Louis/Andrew,

The root cause of the issue has been identified and a fix is in progress.
We should have the fix available on the head of the maint branch very
soon.  Thank you for bringing it to our attention!

Regards,
Michael

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:54 AM, switchlanez via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> I have an issue that may be related. Using LFTX and LFRX boards in an
> X310, anytime I use the RFNoC Radio block in Rx mode the run terminates
> with:
>
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
>   what():  map::at
>
> Following for updates.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Neel Pandeya via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Louis:
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed feedback. We have reproduced this issue, and are
>> debugging it now. We will get back to you and post an update shortly.
>>
>> --​Neel Pandeya
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12 April 2018 at 18:46, Louis Brown via USRP-users <
>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Could it be something to do with this commit for address offsets?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8ee22529f33a63c2
>>> 064b0dc6fbcc04c2ded94b4a
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2018, at 16:38, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Did something change with respect to daughter board addressing in UHD
>>> 3.11?
>>> I have an X310 with LFTX and LFRX  in motherboard slot A.
>>> When I run benchmark_rate it core dumps as follows:
>>>
>>> /*
>>> [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args
>>> "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=10E6
>>>
>>> [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5);
>>> Boost_106400; UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown
>>> [00:00:00.000006] Creating the usrp device with: addr=192.168.40.2...
>>> [INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
>>> [INFO] [X300] Determining maximum frame size...
>>> [INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes.
>>> [INFO] [X300] Setup basic communication...
>>> [INFO] [X300] Loading values from EEPROM...
>>> [INFO] [X300] Setup RF frontend clocking...
>>> [INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock:200
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 0...
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1299 MB/s)
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 1...
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1302 MB/s)
>>> [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_0] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 input
>>> ports
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>> [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_1] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 input
>>> ports
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>> [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test...
>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed
>>> [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test...
>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed
>>> Using Device: Single USRP:
>>> Device: X-Series Device
>>> Mboard 0: X310
>>> RX Channel: 0
>>> RX DSP: 0
>>> RX Dboard: A
>>> RX Subdev: LFRX (AB)
>>> RX Channel: 1
>>> RX DSP: 0
>>> RX Dboard: B
>>> RX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0
>>> TX Channel: 0
>>> TX DSP: 0
>>> TX Dboard: A
>>> TX Subdev: LFTX (AB)
>>> TX Channel: 1
>>> TX DSP: 0
>>> TX Dboard: B
>>> TX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0
>>>
>>> [00:00:02.623786] Setting device timestamp to 0...
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
>>> what(): map::at
>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>> */
>>>
>>>
>>> If I specify tx_channels "1" it runs, lighting up the slot B TX/RX LED,
>>> or course I have no boards installed there.
>>>
>>> /*
>>> [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args
>>> "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=100E6 --tx_channels "1"
>>> */
>>>
>>> If I specify tx_channels "0" it core dumps with the same
>>> std::out_of_range
>>>
>>> Flow graphs that ran in UHD 3.10 with sub-device "A:AB" no longer run:
>>>
>>> /*
>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
>>> what(): map::at
>>> */
>>>
>>> If I try benchmark_rate with another X310 with the UBX card in slot A,
>>> things work fine.  So maybe it's specific to the use of LF cards with UHD
>>> 3.11.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lou
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to