On 07/09/2011 20:36, Adrian Gonzalez wrote: > Sorry, no real difference. > > Even worse, I'm on my home computer and here I don't see anymore the *5 > difference between simple tags and classic tags.
The figures I saw were: Test OP Me Cached tagfile 500 328 203 classic 100 141 156 simple 500 250 156 none 94 140 156 A slight increase in the case where the cache isn't used and a reasonable improvement in the other cases. Performance tuning is always going to be system dependent. In this case I think there us enough evidence to justify putting in the cache - even if this is effectively a micro benchmark. > I'll continue these tests tomorrow at work (perhaps there's some file > scanning / reading in action - and since I'm with AV software...). I'd be very interested to see those results. > - Tests results - > > Downloaded tomcat trunk sources from > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/ That is actually 8.0.x but there is currently very little difference between that an 7.0.x with is at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ Cheers, Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
