"Well, yes, your screwdriver is great I guess, but I already know how to use a hammer."
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>wrote: > You are missing my point. > This is not about how bad / great tapestry-ioc is. > This is about having to learn yet another DI system > before you can truly use tapestry to its full potential. > If it used an existing IOC, the barrier to entry would be lower. > > On May 21, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Inge Solvoll wrote: > > > I love Tapestry IOC. When used in a very basic way, it's almost > > indistinguishable from Guice. Actually it's less intrusive since you > don't > > need annotations for injection. > > > > Tapestry is very powerful when you do more advanced stuff, and I just > love > > that the power's there even though I don't use it that much. > > > > "Why doesn't everyone use X if it's so great?" > > "Why don't you use the standard?" > > > > These questions wrongly assume that standards are always a good thing, > and > > that standards are of high quality. And that the companies funding these > > standards are acting in your best interest, not in their own :) > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com
