On Wed, 15 May 2013 18:57:55 -0300, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>
wrote:
I agree that distributed configuration is great.
But, it's not equivalent to tapestry-ioc.
Agreed.
There are lots of ready-made solutions for distributed configurations
already.
You can also easily build one on top of ready-made CDI implementation,
if you really want to (I don't think there is a need)
Please describe how you could implement distributed configuration. ;)
To get back on topic, yes, you need to learn at least one IOC
framework. The two popular ones
are CDI and Guice. Both very well documented. Chances are most
developers who have kept up
know at least one or the other. And knowing one, they can learn the
other very easily.
Tapestry-IoC documentation could be improved, of course.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
