On Wed, 22 May 2013 09:07:19 -0300, Robert Zeigler
<robert.zeig...@roxanemy.com> wrote:
Unfortunately, no other IOC system (that I've seen) offers something
quite like T5-IOC's "distributed configuration". The closest is perhaps
MultiBinding/MapBinding in Guice
(http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Multibindings). But any
similar Guice/Spring solutions I've seen to date just don't provide the
flexibility and extensibility you get with "distributed configuration",
and those concepts are critical for Tapestry.
I took a look at Multibindings in the Guice documentation and it's not
comparable to Tapestry's distributed configuration. Multibindings doesn't
seem to be have any ordering constraints, something which is crucial to
Tapestry-the-web-framework. Tapestry-IoC wasn't created out of NIH, but
based on Tapestry-the-web-framework needs. Why would Howard waste time
reinventing the wheel in this case?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
