On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM, David Rees <dree...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Ciaran Wood <ciar...@gamesys.co.uk> wrote: >> The issue you were thinking of is >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-714 - there is a patch w/tests >> attached to the issue so a committer can probably fix this one! > > Thanks, voted. BTW, it affects all versions of IE that I tested. > It's a show-stopper, not a minor issue - should raise the priority, > especially since it has a patch.
Agree, maybe not a showstopper, but not a minor either. > How can we encourage the developers to get a release out with some of > these issues? Are people building their own local version with > patches applied? Starting to veer off-topic, but I think the issue there is that Howard has traditionally done all the releases, but he hasn't been actively involved in bug fixing lately (and probably shouldn't need to be). Howard's also been complaining about some difficulties with releasing but I don't know the details. I know though that setting up a fully automated release process with Maven can sometimes be taxing but the efforts are well worth it. Especially for bug fix releases, confidently being able to roll up yet another point release is great (at times, I release my projects a few times a week since it's so simple). I fully agree with you that more frequent point releases for T5 are badly needed. I'd avoid building your own versions if at all possible. Not because building would be too difficult, but with local versions, you need to deal with everything else included - deploying, maintaining, distributing and keeping track of versions. Use nightly snapshots from Formos if you have to and lock down to specific unique snapshot whenever possible. Kalle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org