hello, the missing feedback sounds like "hmm, no, better don't use T5 for a new project now"...
please correct me if i'm wrong :) cheers, martin On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 00:00 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote: > hi, > > we're considering to use tapestry for a new project that > shall go into production at the end of september this year. > > of course the best is to use a tested and stable framework (like > tapestry 4.1), although i want to ask if it would be worth to use > tapestry 5 for the new project. > (posts on the users mailing list like this one > http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tapestry.apache.org/msg11384.html > sound promising) > > according to the roadmap (http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/) > there are several features outstanding - is this description up-to-date? > is there functionality in tapestry 4.1 that is not yet available in > tapestry 5, and is there a summary of what is still missing in t5? > > what is the plan with component libs like tacos in respect to t5 (is > it still needed)? > > if there's anybody out there already using tapestry 5 it would be nice > to get some feedback on the current status of t5, and what is working > and what is not. > > thanx a lot in advance for your advice, > cheers, > martin > > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
