I think client persistence was just committed today by Howard.
On 5/16/07, Juan Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I miss right now tacos library and other ajax components. However i think they are a lot easier to implement in T5 and according to the road map i have seen on the web page the ajax support will be ready soon. Also, i would really like to have client side persistence . Right now Session and Flash are available. (although flash is not documented on the website). On 5/16/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Juan, > > thanx a lot for your feedback, > > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 08:48 -0500, Juan Maya wrote: > > Hi martin, > > I have been using T5 since a few weeks and it has been great! The > increased > > productivity is really amazing and i haven't faced major bugs. > sounds very well! > > > However i couldn't tell u anything about performance and scalability. > I've read that T5 shall be faster than T4, but concerning scalability it > would be good to have some info... > > > My application is still pretty basic and runs smoothly...but it's not > enough to > > say that i will recommend to to use tapestry 5 in a production > environment. > Ok, I totally understand :) > Are you missing any functionality that you perhaps know from T4 (in case > you used T4 before), or some other features? > > Thanx && cheers, > Martin > > > > > > On 5/16/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > hello, > > > > > > the missing feedback sounds like "hmm, no, better don't use > > > T5 for a new project now"... > > > > > > please correct me if i'm wrong :) > > > > > > cheers, > > > martin > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 00:00 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > we're considering to use tapestry for a new project that > > > > shall go into production at the end of september this year. > > > > > > > > of course the best is to use a tested and stable framework (like > > > > tapestry 4.1), although i want to ask if it would be worth to use > > > > tapestry 5 for the new project. > > > > (posts on the users mailing list like this one > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tapestry.apache.org/msg11384.html > > > > sound promising) > > > > > > > > according to the roadmap (http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/) > > > > there are several features outstanding - is this description > up-to-date? > > > > is there functionality in tapestry 4.1 that is not yet available in > > > > tapestry 5, and is there a summary of what is still missing in t5? > > > > > > > > what is the plan with component libs like tacos in respect to t5 (is > > > > > it still needed)? > > > > > > > > if there's anybody out there already using tapestry 5 it would be > nice > > > > to get some feedback on the current status of t5, and what is > working > > > > and what is not. > > > > > > > > thanx a lot in advance for your advice, > > > > cheers, > > > > martin > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Grotzke > > > http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ > > > > > > > -- > Martin Grotzke > http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ > >
