I miss right now tacos library and other ajax components. However i think
they are a lot easier to implement in T5 and according to the road map i
have seen on the web page the ajax support will be ready soon.
Also, i would really like to have client side persistence . Right now
Session and Flash are available. (although flash is not documented on the
website).


On 5/16/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Juan,

thanx a lot for your feedback,

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 08:48 -0500, Juan Maya wrote:
> Hi martin,
> I have been using T5 since a few weeks and it has been great! The
increased
> productivity is really amazing and i haven't faced major bugs.
sounds very well!

> However i couldn't tell u anything about performance and scalability.
I've read that T5 shall be faster than T4, but concerning scalability it
would be good to have some info...

> My application is still pretty basic and runs smoothly...but it's not
enough to
> say that i will recommend to to use tapestry 5 in a production
environment.
Ok, I totally understand :)
Are you missing any functionality that you perhaps know from T4 (in case
you used T4 before), or some other features?

Thanx && cheers,
Martin


>
> On 5/16/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > the missing feedback sounds like "hmm, no, better don't use
> > T5 for a new project now"...
> >
> > please correct me if i'm wrong :)
> >
> > cheers,
> > martin
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 00:00 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > we're considering to use tapestry for a new project that
> > > shall go into production at the end of september this year.
> > >
> > > of course the best is to use a tested and stable framework (like
> > > tapestry 4.1), although i want to ask if it would be worth to use
> > > tapestry 5 for the new project.
> > > (posts on the users mailing list like this one
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tapestry.apache.org/msg11384.html
> > > sound promising)
> > >
> > > according to the roadmap (http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/)
> > > there are several features outstanding - is this description
up-to-date?
> > > is there functionality in tapestry 4.1 that is not yet available in
> > > tapestry 5, and is there a summary of what is still missing in t5?
> > >
> > > what is the plan with component libs like tacos in respect to t5 (is

> > > it still needed)?
> > >
> > > if there's anybody out there already using tapestry 5 it would be
nice
> > > to get some feedback on the current status of t5, and what is
working
> > > and what is not.
> > >
> > > thanx a lot in advance for your advice,
> > > cheers,
> > > martin
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > Martin Grotzke
> > http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
> >
> >
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/


Reply via email to