The logo contest is not a bad ideia, after setting the guidelines of what it
should convey.
The old tap logo is really in need of it's due rest.
The new, well I wasn't quick to get to what it meant. Although that's not
that uncomom.
A few examples we all know:
- mySQL (someone has allready mentioned before)
- PostGreSQL (an elephant?!?!?)
...and I'm sure many more if we think about it.

The catch is to make it mean something and that people get it.
Also I agree that the unicorn in it's current pose is not very good.
A unicorn also has a conotation of power, being mitical animals. Not just
the fary tales mentioned.
They appear in many ilustrations with very muscular bodys. A horse is a
powerfull animal, but this unicorn is a bit thin, a bit weak, a bit feminine
as someone has allready said, and pointing upwards is not that good idea.

So, a good explanation on the unicord conotation, a refinement on the design
to make it more powerfull, a new pose and well, we could think more about it
from there. IMHO of course!

On 5/15/06, Stephane Decleire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Why not start with the beginning and list all the ideas the new logo
should convey ....

Paul Russell wrote:

> On 15 May 2006, at 20:37, Wayland Chan wrote:
>
>> "Constructive criticism"
>> Simply saying you don't like it without providing a better alternative
>> is....well no need for me to finish that sentence.
>
>
> Well, ish. The issue with Logo's is that they're the first thing
> people use to judge your project. If people don't like it in general,
> that's important information to take on board, regardless of whether
> a viable alternative is on the table.
>
> I have to say, personally, I'm not totally against the original logo
> -- it does have simplicity on its side. That said, like everyone
> else, I appreciate the need to move on. Maybe we should be
> considering delaying changing the logo, and having some kind of logo
> contest (cliched, I know) to make sure we choose something that has
> general appeal?
>
> Just my $0.10.
>
> Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

--
Stéphane Decleire

05 56 57 99 20
06 63 78 69 06





--
Pedro Viegas

Reply via email to