The logo contest is not a bad ideia, after setting the guidelines of what it should convey. The old tap logo is really in need of it's due rest. The new, well I wasn't quick to get to what it meant. Although that's not that uncomom. A few examples we all know: - mySQL (someone has allready mentioned before) - PostGreSQL (an elephant?!?!?) ...and I'm sure many more if we think about it.
The catch is to make it mean something and that people get it. Also I agree that the unicorn in it's current pose is not very good. A unicorn also has a conotation of power, being mitical animals. Not just the fary tales mentioned. They appear in many ilustrations with very muscular bodys. A horse is a powerfull animal, but this unicorn is a bit thin, a bit weak, a bit feminine as someone has allready said, and pointing upwards is not that good idea. So, a good explanation on the unicord conotation, a refinement on the design to make it more powerfull, a new pose and well, we could think more about it from there. IMHO of course! On 5/15/06, Stephane Decleire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not start with the beginning and list all the ideas the new logo should convey .... Paul Russell wrote: > On 15 May 2006, at 20:37, Wayland Chan wrote: > >> "Constructive criticism" >> Simply saying you don't like it without providing a better alternative >> is....well no need for me to finish that sentence. > > > Well, ish. The issue with Logo's is that they're the first thing > people use to judge your project. If people don't like it in general, > that's important information to take on board, regardless of whether > a viable alternative is on the table. > > I have to say, personally, I'm not totally against the original logo > -- it does have simplicity on its side. That said, like everyone > else, I appreciate the need to move on. Maybe we should be > considering delaying changing the logo, and having some kind of logo > contest (cliched, I know) to make sure we choose something that has > general appeal? > > Just my $0.10. > > Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Stéphane Decleire 05 56 57 99 20 06 63 78 69 06
-- Pedro Viegas