Very good response Paul!
<!-- @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in }
P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --> Negative reaction is very important
to look at when people are genuinely seeking for input rather than for
corroboration.
IMO logo should be either completely neutral like some geometrical shape or
bear ubiquitous reference to something.
I think the proposed unicorn does not fit in any of those categories.
Konstantin Ignatyev
----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 1:28:12 PM
Subject: Re: I do not like the new tapestry logo
On 15 May 2006, at 20:37, Wayland Chan wrote:
> "Constructive criticism"
> Simply saying you don't like it without providing a better alternative
> is....well no need for me to finish that sentence.
Well, ish. The issue with Logo's is that they're the first thing
people use to judge your project. If people don't like it in general,
that's important information to take on board, regardless of whether
a viable alternative is on the table.
I have to say, personally, I'm not totally against the original logo
-- it does have simplicity on its side. That said, like everyone
else, I appreciate the need to move on. Maybe we should be
considering delaying changing the logo, and having some kind of logo
contest (cliched, I know) to make sure we choose something that has
general appeal?
Just my $0.10.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
