Why not start with the beginning and list all the ideas the new logo
should convey ....
Paul Russell wrote:
On 15 May 2006, at 20:37, Wayland Chan wrote:
"Constructive criticism"
Simply saying you don't like it without providing a better alternative
is....well no need for me to finish that sentence.
Well, ish. The issue with Logo's is that they're the first thing
people use to judge your project. If people don't like it in general,
that's important information to take on board, regardless of whether
a viable alternative is on the table.
I have to say, personally, I'm not totally against the original logo
-- it does have simplicity on its side. That said, like everyone
else, I appreciate the need to move on. Maybe we should be
considering delaying changing the logo, and having some kind of logo
contest (cliched, I know) to make sure we choose something that has
general appeal?
Just my $0.10.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stéphane Decleire
05 56 57 99 20
06 63 78 69 06
